About h4831sc
About h4831sc
Blog Article
H1000 is on my wish listing of powders in addition. Perhaps the IMR Enduron series will probably be properly appreciated and I'm able to move to that for better availability.
H4831 will perform during the Swift although not serious effectively. You can expect to hardly ever get the pressures you may need for regularity With all the .223. 760, or H414 might be better but for many purpose I ain't the most significant enthusiast of most ball powders.
What's the primary difference? Compression. With no Severe/heavy compression affiliated with the very long grain 7828, the pressure curve was altered and the load fell aside.
With all the 154 grain Hornady SP from the 280, H4831 gave me superior teams and great velocity, but Rottweil R905 includes a drastically greater velocity and gives marginally much better accuracy. With Swift one hundred fifty grain Sciroccos while in the 7mm RM, H4831SC gave great precision and velocity, but RL22 was marginally superior. As a result, in Each and every of those circumstances I went with One more powder, but I would definitely dislike to divest myself in the H4831.
The only distinction as I understand it would be that the SC was created to function by way of powder actions much better (which it does). The longer grains never feed very well in any way in some measures. Thats my 02 :grin:
I have utilised H4831 and H4831SC in my 260 Rem without variance. The one thing is definitely the shorter cut offers you a little more Place. Fantastic luck!gun)
I have utilised both and utilized the exact same charges and possess not been able to convey to any noticable differences with performance. the SC Variation meters a little bit smoother is about all. any opinions??
In actual fact, It really is even a good idea to again down and get the job done up safely and securely once you go from 1 great h4831sc deal to a different wide range of precisely the same powder.
With the smoother circulation characteristics comes additional uniform demand weights, although the person grains orient extra compactly, producing superior loading density.
Why would I mention this? Exactly what is my issue? I am not sure that there's a authentic valid point in addition to what on earth is common with most has not been preferred with me in the least in these conditions. Do I just have a powder jinx or a little something? Only h4831sc load data to explain to you how outrageous I really am, tomorrow I'm selection screening a friends new .
Kansas Town, MO I would get regardless of what is accessible right this moment. I’ve used the two while with my go to load and didn’t h4831 vs h4831sc see anything at all unique overall performance smart.
The "SC" stands for Shorter Lower. I haven't observed a distinction between either powder dut I don't Assume I would combine them.
Both equally have the Exact same burn up amount, shorter cut comes in handy When you are at max fill and not at stress/velocity that you'd like you can obtain additional shortcut in a case.
This looks as if a fantastic destination to disclose a bit more details on Hodgdon, H4831 precisely...I as soon as had a pound of H4831SC sit on the shelf for a variety of decades. It absolutely was purchased prior to Hodgdon started publicizing the "Serious" line of powders, of which the H4831s are an element.